INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT OVERVIEW

World Wildlife Fund, Inc. (WWF) policies and procedures for all GEF financed full-sized projects require a midterm evaluation (MTE). The following terms of reference (TOR) sets out the expectations for the MTE for the project: “Mainstreaming Biodiversity Conservation in the Tourism Sector of the Protected Areas and Strategic Ecosystems of San Andres, Old Providence, and Santa Catalina Islands” hereafter referred to as the “Project.” The technical consultant selected to conduct this evaluation will hereafter be referred to as “evaluator.”

The Project seeks to mainstream biodiversity conservation and green recovery in the tourism sector to maintain ecosystem health and the environmental goods and services provided by the Seaflower MPA. The Project was organized into the following components:

• Component 1 – Planning and Institutional Framework for a biodiversity focused tourism sector in the MPA, PAs and three islands of the Archipelago, in the context of the POMIUAC. Component 1 seeks to integrate into the POMIUAC different strategies and regulations for mainstreaming biodiversity in the tourism sector of the Archipelago, inclusive of beach areas and other landscapes in the project intervention areas. This component, therefore, seeks to address improved governance, the identification of effective policies, and capacity building.
• Component 2 – Management of tourism impacts on the key biodiversity of the MPA, PAs and the three islands. This component focuses on the generation of comprehensive and reliable information on the impact of the tourism sector on the biodiversity of the Archipelago for supporting management decisions and to ensure its proper diffusion and dissemination with policy makers, authorities, and the public; and using this information to undertake management actions to reduce the threats caused by tourism on key ecosystems and species.
• Component 3 – Biodiversity mainstreaming in innovative coastal and marine local tourism development in the MPA, PAs and three islands. This component seeks to consolidate tourism as a tool for the conservation of biodiversity in MPAs, PAs and the three islands of the archipelago – it will engage with the small-scale tourism operators of the Islands to strengthen and mainstream biodiversity conservation and green recovery approaches into existing local tourism initiatives, develop a strategy to integrate and preserve biodiversity-friendly culturally rich community-based tourism, select small tourism businesses preliminarily identified by CORALINA, and the development of marketing plans and strengthening of business models and promote the alignment of the business models with the conservation actions of the ecosystems and species management plans.
• Component 4 – Monitoring and Evaluation, awareness raising and knowledge management.

CONSULTANCY INFORMATION

Location Flexible

Reporting to Amelia Kissick, WWF-US

Preferred timeframe Mid-January – mid-April 2025

Potential sites to visit:

• San Andres Island: Johnny Cay Regional Park, Old Point Regional Park, Beaches: Spratt Bight and Rocky Cay, Haynes Cay and Rose Cay, and San Andres Bay. Plus community visits to: San Luis – Santa María Estrella del Mar Church, The Hill – San Francisco Church, Touristic workers of Spratt Bight (Conative Brothers) and Rocky Cay, Tourism unions: COTELCO, ASHOTEL, ANATO, Alójate Inn, ASOPOSADAS, DISAA – Diving Core, Grupo Welcome, ACOTUR and ACODRES.
• Providence and Santa Catalina Islands: The Peak Regional Park, Beaches: Manzanillo and Southwest Bay (including the mangrove), Mangroves of Santa Catalina and Town. Plus community visits to: Ombudsman Leaders, Juntas de Acción Comunal (JAC), Tourism workers from the beaches of Manzanillo y Southwest Bay, Tourism Technical Bureau, Town Hall of Providence and Santa Catalina.

PROJECT DATA

• Project/Program Title Mainstreaming Biodiversity Conservation in the Tourism Sector of the Protected Areas and Strategic Ecosystems of San Andres, Old Providence, and Santa Catalina Islands
• GEF Project ID 10578
• WWF (Agency) Project ID G0031
• Implementing Agency(s) WWF-GEF
• Executing Agency Conservation International (CI Colombia), Corporation for the Sustainable Development of the Archipelago of San Andrés, Providencia, and Santa Catalina (Coralina)
• Executing Partner(s) MADS
• Countries Colombia
• Focal Area(s) Biodiversity
• GEF Operational Program GEF-7
• Total GEF Approved Budget $ 2,652,294
• Total Co-financing Approved $21,646,236

RELEVANT DATES

• CEO Endorsement/Approval June 16, 2022
• Agency Approval Date November 6, 2022
• Implementation Start November 09th, 2022
• Project Completion Date (proposed or actual) June 30th, 2026

EVALUATION APPROACH AND METHOD

The evaluation will adhere to the relevant guidance, rules and procedures established by WWF[1] and align with guidance from the GEF Terminal Evaluation[2] and Ethical Guidelines.[3] The evaluation must provide evidence‐based information that is independent, participatory, transparent, and ethical. The evaluator must be unbiased and free of any conflicts of interest with the project. The evaluator is expected to reflect all stakeholder views and follow a participatory and consultative approach. There should be close engagement with government counterparts, the GEF operational focal points in the country, the Executing Agency project management unit (PMU), partners and key stakeholders. Contact information will be provided.

The Evaluation process will include the following, with deliverables marked by “*”:

1. Desk review consisting of, but not limited to:
   • Project Document and CEO Endorsement Letter;
   • Relevant safeguards documents, including the Safeguards Screen and the Categorization memo, Stakeholder Engagement Plan;
   • METT tools for the MPA and 3 Protected Areas;
   • Annual Work Plans (AWP) and Budgets;
   • Project Progress Reports (PPR) including Results Framework and AWP Tracking;
   • GEF Agency reports, including Project Implementation Reports (PIRs) and Supervision Mission Reports (PrISM);
   • Relevant financial documents, including financial progress reports; co-financing monitoring tables and co-financing letters;
   • Meeting minutes (Project Steering Committee (PSC)) and relevant virtual meetings with the WWF- GEF Agency and support team; and
   • Other relevant documents provided by the Executing Agency and partners.
2. Inception report that outlines evaluation methodology*, which shall include data sources and data collection procedure, initial list of partners and stakeholders to be contacted for visits and interviews, revised timeline, survey tools or questionnaires to be utilized ,Evaluation Matrix with guiding questions, etc ;
3. Field visits with PMU and project partners, as necessary and feasible;
4. Interviews, discussions and consultations at local levels, national and international levels, including CI Colombia, CORALINA, other executing partners, GEF Operational Focal Points (OFP), Project Steering Committee (PSC) members, beneficiaries, Technical Committee Members, WWF GEF and Extended Team primarily conducted virtually;
5. Post-field visit debrief and presentation* of initial findings to project management team and other partners as feasible;
6. Draft report* not to exceed 60 pages (excluding annexes) shared with GEF AMU and PMU for review and feedback. A sample outline will be provided; and
7. Final MTE report* that has incorporated feedback and comments.

EXPECTED CONTENT OF EVALUATION REPORT

The Midterm Evaluation report will include:

• Information on the evaluation process, including when the evaluation took place, sites visited, participants, key questions, summary of methodology and rating rubric, and feedback log showing how comments on draft were incorporated;
  • Assessment of Relevance (project design, theory of change);
  • Assessment of project Effectiveness and rating of project objective and outcomes (individual and overall);
  • Assessment and rating of risks to the Sustainability of project outcomes;
  • Assessment and rating of Monitoring and Evaluation design and implementation;
  • Assessment of knowledge management approach, including activities and products;
  • Assessment of replication and catalytic effects of the project;
  • Assessment of Relevance of the project (e.g. with WWF and GEF priorities) and Coherence;
  • Assessment of stakeholder engagement(e.g. private sector and communities), analysis of the level of participation, collaboration and ownership of various stakeholders, including commitments made by local partners and collaborators;
  • Assessment of gender-responsive measures;
  • Assessment of any environmental and social impacts and safeguards used for the project. A review of risk category classification and mitigation measures;
  • Assessment of Efficiency, financial management and summary of co-financing delivered;
  • Assessment and ratings of Implementation and Execution;
  • Summary table of key findings by core criteria[4] and GEF ratings, including justification and/or indicators for their determination;
  • Key lessons tied to identified strengths or issues;
  • Recommendations that include: practical and short-term corrective actions by evaluation criteria to address issues and findings; and best practices towards achieving project outcomes, and knowledge sharing / replication for other projects of similar scope.

QUALIFICATIONS OF CONSULTANT(S)

Required Qualifications and Experience

• Minimum 10 years of relevant professional experience in monitoring and evaluation of multilateral donor funded conservation projects;
• Diverse experience with evaluation methodologies
• Excellent written and oral communication in English and Spanish.

Preferred Qualifications and Experience

• Recent experience conducting evaluations (for GEF financed projects is an advantage);
• Technical knowledge in the- Biodiversity or Natural Resource Management, Natural Sciences, Public Policy, Sustainable Development;
• Knowledge of GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy;
• Experience with WWF Project and Program Management Standards or Conservation Standards;
• Experience with social assessments, participatory techniques, and gender mainstreaming;
• Knowledge and experience in implementing or reviewing application of social and environmental safeguards policies in GEF (or similar) projects;
• Regional experience an asset; and
• Ample experience working with government agencies and regional governance bodies, specifically in the region and, preferably, with multiple government bodies.

To review the full terms of reference, including annexes, please visit: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1q0edTy5lix9H7iJ-j2qvd-OotvKpjb-h/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=101431196757707270045&rtpof=true&sd=true

[1] For additional information on evaluation methods adopted by WWF, see the WWF Evaluation Guidelines , published on our WWF Program Standards public website.

[2] For additional information on the GEF Terminal Evaluation Guidelines, see the GEF Terminal Evaluation Guidelines , published on the GEF Independent Evaluation Office website.

[3] Please see the GEF Ethical Guidelines as published on GEF website.

[4] See annex A